---
title: 2025 Norway Transparency Act Report
url: "https://www.systra.com/norway/2024-norway-transparency-act-report/"
type: page
date_published: 2024-05-16
date_modified: 2026-03-11
schema:
  @type: WebPage
language: nb-NO
word_count: 1488
reading_time: 8 min
canonical: "https://www.systra.com/norway/2024-norway-transparency-act-report/"
featured_image: "https://www.systra.com/norway/wp-content/uploads/sites/27/2024/09/lysaker-togstasjon-scaled.jpg"
---

# 2025 Norway Transparency Act Report

![2025 Norway Transparency Act Report](https://www.systra.com/norway/wp-content/uploads/sites/27/2024/09/lysaker-togstasjon-scaled.jpg)

**1\. Introduction**This report was prepared for SYSTRA Norway AS (“SYSTRA
Norway” or the “Company”) and is made in accordance with the
_Act relating to enterprises’ transparency and work on human rights and decent working conditions_
(the “Transparency Act”). SYSTRA Norway is registered at Lilleakerveien 2D,
Oslo, 0283, Norway. SYSTRA Norway ultimate parent company is SYSTRA SA, Paris,
France

**2\. Structure & Areas of Operations**

The Company was established in Norway in 1987 and is one of the world’s leading
design, engineering and project management consultancies. Across our services,
we leverage our capabilities to meet the demands of the future for our clients
in decarbonization and sustainable solutions by connecting people, data and
technology. We harness our global scale to maintain a relentless focus on
consistency, efficiency and operational excellence across our portfolio of
services complemented by our regional delivery model.

**3\. Policies and Procedures**

SYSTRA SA (parent company of SYSTRA Norway) is a signatory to the UN Global
Compact. The approach is aligned with the principles of the OECD Guidelines for
Multinational Enterprises.

_Code of Conduct_

Our Code of Conduct sets the standards of how we work. The compliance with the
Code of Conduct is mandatory for all personnel. The Code of Conduct articulates
our values and includes a section dedicated to human rights. We aim to maintain
high ethical standards in the conduct of our business.

_Human Rights Policy_

The Human Rights Policy sets out the expectations and guidelines with respect to
human rights. We support and respect the protection of internationally
recognized human rights, including the Universal Declaration of Human Rights;
the Ten Principles of the United Nation Global Compact; the International Labour
Organization’s Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work; the UN
Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights.

The Company prohibits all forms of modern slavery, forced labour and child
labour. The Company permits workers to end, with appropriate notice, their
employment; ensures workers maintain free access to their passports, identity
papers, work permits, travel documents and other personal legal documents. The
Company bears the full cost of recruitment and placement of personnel; prohibits
compulsory and abusive overtime practices; pays wages regularly, directly and on
time; respects the freedom of association and the rights to worker
representation.

_Suppliers and Counterparties_

We commit to undertake business with integrity and expect our suppliers,
subcontractors, and consultants to respect and adhere to our values and high
ethical standards of conduct. The Supplier Code of Conduct and the Counterparty
Code of Conduct summarizes the expectations and governing principles, including
those related to human rights. The Suppliers and Counterparties with which we
engage are expected to accept and adhere to our Supplier/Counterparty Code of
Conduct.

_Human Resources_

We have human resources governance documents to protect our personnel/candidates
and foster an equitable, diverse and inclusive culture. These include: the
_Human Resources Policy_, Workplace Discrimination, Harassment and Violence
Procedure and Equality, Diversity & Inclusion Commitment.

**4\. Risk Assessments**

The Compliance Risk Assessment (“CRA”) is designed to help us better understand
risks that our business operations may face. The objective is to:

- Produce focused and actionable information when defining risk;
- Determine related remedial action within the organization; and
- Enable the senior leadership to periodically verify the progress of remedial
  actions.

We determine the countries of focus using key risk indicators, including: the
personnel headcount, Transparency International Corruption Perception Index,
FCPA/UKBA Enforcement actions, revenue per country, Global Slavery Index, number
of craft labourers. In each of the selected countries, we distribute a risk
survey questionnaire to key managers with questions on bribery and corruption,
antitrust, modern slavery, and lobbying. Then, the findings are summarized and
discussed with the operational business and senior leadership. CRAs are
undertaken every 18 months, to ensure we capture any new risks.

**5\. Third Party Due Diligence**

The Company expects third parties with whom we work to adhere to business
principles and values similar to our own and to comply with all applicable laws
and regulations. Before making any commitments to third parties, we take steps
to evaluate the relationship and mitigate any associated risks by carrying out
risk-based due diligence and checks:

- The Vendor Integrity Verification process is an integral part of the Company’s
  Integrity program. We use multiple screening tools and databases to ensure
  vendors are ethical through a rigorous screening, including an ongoing
  monitoring process on our business partners.
- All clients for international projects undergo an Integrity Check. If there
  are any findings a prior review and endorsement by the Integrity team. Our
  Integrity Checks verify if a third party is listed on any national or
  international risk and compliance databases and watch lists (including denied
  and sanctions lists), has a history of corruption, collusion, fraud or
  labor/human right violations or related issues through adverse media and
  publicly available information research, whether it is a state-owned
  entity/politically exposed people, or appears on a Reference List before we
  decide whether to proceed with engaging them.
- A uniform risk assessment of business partners performing intermediary
  functions on our behalf is a companywide requirement. Based on a set of
  defined risk indicators – such as the risk of corruption in the country in
  which the work is undertaken – a risk rating (basic, standard or enhanced) is
  specified for each transaction. The risk rating determines the subsequent
  action (e.g., due diligence, approval requirements and mandatory contractual
  clauses) taken regarding business partners.
- Counterparties/Suppliers are required to accept integrity-related contractual
  provisions and adhere to our Counterparty/Supplier Code of Conduct.
- In high-risk areas, we ensure our contracts with employment agencies stipulate
  that it is prohibited to require employees to pay recruitment fees. In
  addition, as part of our on-boarding process in these areas, we verify with
  craft and general labour workers that they were not asked to pay such fees.

**6\. Grievance Mechanism**

All our personnel, suppliers and counterparties have a duty to report any known
or suspected violation of our Code of Conduct or any governance documents, as
well as any violation of applicable laws, rules or regulations. These
requirements are set out in our Code of Conduct, Compliance Procedure and
Supplier Code of Conduct. The various reporting channels are available as per
our Reporting work instruction. One such channel is an independent,
confidential, and anonymous reporting line.

The reporting line allows anyone to report ethical and compliance concerns,
including any concerns about human rights. The line is available for both
personnel and third parties who may potentially witness a violation. The line is
staffed by individuals who speak a variety of languages, to facilitate
communication and reporting in any region of the world.

We make sure our personnel can disclose, without fear of retaliation, concerns,
complaints or allegations of known or suspected wrongdoing or misconduct,
regardless of the local norms and culture. We review all reported matters and
investigate when required, within a reasonable timeframe.

**7\. Training and Awareness**

Every year, our personnel at all levels are required to complete a mandatory
certification to ensure that our Code of Conduct is understood and properly
applied to our daily activities, including on human rights. The Company training
curriculum includes training on: Anti-corruption, Antitrust and Competition,
human trafficking, business partners, gifts & hospitality, etc.

On our website, we have a short
[video](https://www.snclavalin.com/en/about/suppliers) on our Supplier Code of
Conduct which includes a portion on human rights and the Duty to Report. The
video is available in four languages (English, French, Spanish and Portuguese).

**8\. Effectiveness**

Monitoring the effectiveness of our actions is a key element to ensure we are
reducing the risk. We review all reported matters and investigate when required,
within a reasonable timeframe. We keep track of all our employees’ mandatory
training sessions: ensuring it is completed on time and following up when
necessary. We have audit processes to flag, identify and address potential
weaknesses or risks. We believe these are key elements to spread the message,
set the tone and to ensure any suspected act of human right abuses is dealt with
accordingly.

We use the Compliance Control Framework (“CCF”) to test and monitor the internal
controls that comprise its Integrity Program. Led by the Compliance
Investigations team, the CFF tests the integrity program key controls. These
controls are sampled and tested to determine whether the Integrity Program is
being effectively implemented.

For each control procedure of the CCF, we assess the design (i.e., whether the
control mitigates the compliance risk identified) and its operating
effectiveness (i.e., whether the control operates as planned). To assess the
controls operating effectiveness, the control procedures are tested on a sample
basis, consistent with our Internal Audit department’s methodology. Testing is
performed by obtaining documentation supporting the occurrence of the control
procedure and sample sizes are determined based on control frequency.

**9\. Approval**

This report relates to our financial year that ended on December 31, 2025, and
was approved by SYSTRA Norway Managing Director, Lars Magnus Eriksson.

Lars Magnus Eriksson

Managing Director, SYSTRA Norway